BOLTON: BIG PHONY for UN
* 
NUTS and BOLTS on BOLTON
President Bush just forced John Bolton on us, skirting the Congressional confirmation process by giving him a temporary appointment, like Bill Clinton did with James Hormel, the homosexual.
Of course when Slick pulled that with Hormel, Christian conservatives were up in arms at the sneaky tactic, but somehow now the EXACT SAME tactic is a good move when Bush does it. Can you say "hypocrisy"?
Also, if he is a true conservative, why can't Bush get him confirmed in a Congress with a significant Republican majority?
John Bolton is being cast as some kind of anti-UN patriot. As soon as I learned he was a CFR member, I knew that couldn't be true. When something looks too good to be true, it usually is. Bush would never nominate someone who is truly anti-UN/NWO. This is (Big) "Brother" Bush at his best, painting a staunch New World Order lackey as an anti-UN zealot. And Conservatives will swallow it readily.
Maybe he once was genuine, but if he was, certainly now he's aboard the Bush train heading America towards the cliff.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20050412/ts_alt_afp/usunboltonpolitics_050412082307
Bolton vows 'close partnership' at UN, says it plays 'critical role'
Tue Apr 12, 4:23 AM ET U.S. National - AFP
WASHINGTON (AFP) - Under fire from Democratic lawmakers, John Bolton, the controversial nominee to be the next US ambassador to the United Nations, pledged at his confirmation hearing here to strengthen US relations with the world body. "If confirmed, I pledge to fulfill the president's vision of working in close partnership with the United Nations," said Bolton, who was nominated last month by President George W. Bush to succeed John Negroponte.
TG: He says he wants to work closely with the UN, not to eradicate the UN.
"Now more than ever, the UN must play a critical role as it strives to fulfill the dreams, the hope and aspiration of its original promise," said Bolton, who faced tough questioning from Democrats over his past scornful statements about the world body.
TG: The UN MUST play a critical role, he says? Remember, The UN's "original" promise was a WORLDWIDE COMMUNIST OLIGARCHY. Virtually every founder of the UN were hardened Communists, mostly Soviets. Their "original promise" was anti-God, anti-American, anti-gun, pro-abortion, pro-sodomy, and totalitarian to the core.
"The United States is committed to the success of the United Nations, and we view the UN as an important component of our diplomacy," Bolton told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
TG: We must be committed to the SUCCESS of the UN? Read the above again to see what would be "success" for the UN.
"If confirmed, I look forward to working closely with this committee to forge a stronger relationship between the United States and the United Nations, which depends critically on American leadership," he added.
TG: A STRONGER relationship with an anti-American group we should get out of altogether?
Bolton told US lawmakers that he had received words of support for his candidacy from UN Secretary General Kofi Annan. "He said, 'get yourself confirmed quickly'," Bolton told the committee summing up a brief recent phone conversation with Annan.
TG: Why would Kofi Annan want Bolton confirmed quickly if he is really anti-UN? If Bush and Kofi both recommend him, he MUST be a New Worlder. How can Republican, conservatives, and Christians be so stupid to ignore that?
Five Republican former US secretaries of state this month lobbied on his behalf, urging the Senate to confirm him. The signatories of that letter were James Baker, Lawrence Eagleburger, Alexander Haig, Henry Kissinger and George Shultz (TG: ALL CFR members). Notably absent was Bush's first secretary of state, Colin Powell, who was Bolton's boss. The hearing was briefly interrupted by demonstrators denouncing Bolton's nomination. They were quickly escorted from the hearing room.
Bolton Bared
I've already posted things to prove that Bush's nominee to the UN, John Bolton, is as phony as a $13 bill, despite the media attempts to portray him as an anti-UN, ultra-conservative. However, more pieces of evidence keep surfacing.
The 5-05 John Birch Society Bulletin divulges that Bolton, a CFR one-world gov't group member, gave a speech on October 19th, 2004 entitled, "The Bush Administration's Forward Strategy for Nonproliferation". Apparently Bolton would support continuing the Clinton military cutbacks.
But that's not all. The 5-16-05 New American adds a few other items:
The supposedly pro-American, anti-UN Bolton exposed himself by insisting, "Walking away from the United Nations is not an option."
Why not? If the UN is harmful to the goals of the US, why shouldn't we walk away from it? Isn't that what President Bush is credited with doing to go after Saddam? That means Bolton is actually more pro-UN than Bush. He proves it by saying:
"The United States is committed to the success of the United Nations, and we view the UN as an important component of our diplomacy."
Why should we be committed to the success of a Communist infested, anti-gun, anti-Christian, pro-abortion, pro-queer, New World Order organization? But Bolton continues:
"Now more than ever, the UN must play a critical role as it strives to fulfill the aspirations of its original promise."
Remember, the UN's "original" promise was a WORLDWIDE COMMUNIST OLIGARCHY. Virtually every founder of the UN were hardened Communists, mostly Soviets. Their "original promise" was anti-God, anti-gun, pro-abortion, pro-sodomy, and totalitarian to the core.
Bolton wants to "strengthen" the UN and make it "more efficient". A stronger, more efficient organization that opposes everything America has traditionally stood for.
How did this guy ever get a reputation as an anti-UN crusader? Conservatives are so gullible and naive to accept anyone who calls himself a Republican.
NUTS and BOLTS on BOLTON
President Bush just forced John Bolton on us, skirting the Congressional confirmation process by giving him a temporary appointment, like Bill Clinton did with James Hormel, the homosexual.
Of course when Slick pulled that with Hormel, Christian conservatives were up in arms at the sneaky tactic, but somehow now the EXACT SAME tactic is a good move when Bush does it. Can you say "hypocrisy"?
Also, if he is a true conservative, why can't Bush get him confirmed in a Congress with a significant Republican majority?
John Bolton is being cast as some kind of anti-UN patriot. As soon as I learned he was a CFR member, I knew that couldn't be true. When something looks too good to be true, it usually is. Bush would never nominate someone who is truly anti-UN/NWO. This is (Big) "Brother" Bush at his best, painting a staunch New World Order lackey as an anti-UN zealot. And Conservatives will swallow it readily.
Maybe he once was genuine, but if he was, certainly now he's aboard the Bush train heading America towards the cliff.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20050412/ts_alt_afp/usunboltonpolitics_050412082307
Bolton vows 'close partnership' at UN, says it plays 'critical role'
Tue Apr 12, 4:23 AM ET U.S. National - AFP
WASHINGTON (AFP) - Under fire from Democratic lawmakers, John Bolton, the controversial nominee to be the next US ambassador to the United Nations, pledged at his confirmation hearing here to strengthen US relations with the world body. "If confirmed, I pledge to fulfill the president's vision of working in close partnership with the United Nations," said Bolton, who was nominated last month by President George W. Bush to succeed John Negroponte.
TG: He says he wants to work closely with the UN, not to eradicate the UN.
"Now more than ever, the UN must play a critical role as it strives to fulfill the dreams, the hope and aspiration of its original promise," said Bolton, who faced tough questioning from Democrats over his past scornful statements about the world body.
TG: The UN MUST play a critical role, he says? Remember, The UN's "original" promise was a WORLDWIDE COMMUNIST OLIGARCHY. Virtually every founder of the UN were hardened Communists, mostly Soviets. Their "original promise" was anti-God, anti-American, anti-gun, pro-abortion, pro-sodomy, and totalitarian to the core.
"The United States is committed to the success of the United Nations, and we view the UN as an important component of our diplomacy," Bolton told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
TG: We must be committed to the SUCCESS of the UN? Read the above again to see what would be "success" for the UN.
"If confirmed, I look forward to working closely with this committee to forge a stronger relationship between the United States and the United Nations, which depends critically on American leadership," he added.
TG: A STRONGER relationship with an anti-American group we should get out of altogether?
Bolton told US lawmakers that he had received words of support for his candidacy from UN Secretary General Kofi Annan. "He said, 'get yourself confirmed quickly'," Bolton told the committee summing up a brief recent phone conversation with Annan.
TG: Why would Kofi Annan want Bolton confirmed quickly if he is really anti-UN? If Bush and Kofi both recommend him, he MUST be a New Worlder. How can Republican, conservatives, and Christians be so stupid to ignore that?
Five Republican former US secretaries of state this month lobbied on his behalf, urging the Senate to confirm him. The signatories of that letter were James Baker, Lawrence Eagleburger, Alexander Haig, Henry Kissinger and George Shultz (TG: ALL CFR members). Notably absent was Bush's first secretary of state, Colin Powell, who was Bolton's boss. The hearing was briefly interrupted by demonstrators denouncing Bolton's nomination. They were quickly escorted from the hearing room.
Bolton Bared
I've already posted things to prove that Bush's nominee to the UN, John Bolton, is as phony as a $13 bill, despite the media attempts to portray him as an anti-UN, ultra-conservative. However, more pieces of evidence keep surfacing.
The 5-05 John Birch Society Bulletin divulges that Bolton, a CFR one-world gov't group member, gave a speech on October 19th, 2004 entitled, "The Bush Administration's Forward Strategy for Nonproliferation". Apparently Bolton would support continuing the Clinton military cutbacks.
But that's not all. The 5-16-05 New American adds a few other items:
The supposedly pro-American, anti-UN Bolton exposed himself by insisting, "Walking away from the United Nations is not an option."
Why not? If the UN is harmful to the goals of the US, why shouldn't we walk away from it? Isn't that what President Bush is credited with doing to go after Saddam? That means Bolton is actually more pro-UN than Bush. He proves it by saying:
"The United States is committed to the success of the United Nations, and we view the UN as an important component of our diplomacy."
Why should we be committed to the success of a Communist infested, anti-gun, anti-Christian, pro-abortion, pro-queer, New World Order organization? But Bolton continues:
"Now more than ever, the UN must play a critical role as it strives to fulfill the aspirations of its original promise."
Remember, the UN's "original" promise was a WORLDWIDE COMMUNIST OLIGARCHY. Virtually every founder of the UN were hardened Communists, mostly Soviets. Their "original promise" was anti-God, anti-gun, pro-abortion, pro-sodomy, and totalitarian to the core.
Bolton wants to "strengthen" the UN and make it "more efficient". A stronger, more efficient organization that opposes everything America has traditionally stood for.
How did this guy ever get a reputation as an anti-UN crusader? Conservatives are so gullible and naive to accept anyone who calls himself a Republican.
posted by T.G. at
6:59 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home